creating inet6num objects in RIPE database for customer IPv6 networks

I work in a company where we have been very strict with documenting and creating inetnum objects in RIPE database for IPv4 addresses, which we have allocated to our customers(from /31 networks to /24). However, for IPv6 we have only created inet6num object to our huge /32 IPv6 network, but none of the customer allocations(usually /48) are documented in RIPE database. Should one do this? Is this mandatory? In addition, as I have understood, one might get into trouble if he doesn't document it's IPv4 addresses in RIPE(lose it's allocation)- does the same apply to IPv6 addresses as well? I mean might we lose our /32 IPv6 network if we proceed with current practise and not register customer IPv6 allocations in RIPE database? regards, martin
participants (1)
-
Martin T