Thank You. :) But is there some policies or other stuff that says it? On 11/01/2010 10:40 PM, Jussi Sallinen wrote:

No, you shouldnt delete those :-)

-- -Jussi Sallinen +358407007600 jussi@unikko.org

On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 10:17:22PM +0300, Alexander Zubkov wrote:

...

My object is maintained by my maintainer also, I have no problem with access to it. The question was: can I delete RIPE-NCC-END-MNT? Actually, I've deleted it successfully and got no error. But may be I shouldn't do that? :)

On 11/01/2010 10:06 PM, Shane Kerr wrote:

...

Alexander,

On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 21:47 +0300, Alexander Zubkov wrote:

...

Hi. Should I preserve this:

mnt-by: RIPE-NCC-END-MNT mnt-lower: RIPE-NCC-END-MNT

in my inet6num ASSIGNED PI? And if I should, why not this forced by database update validator?

The RIPE-NCC-END-MNT object has the following "descr:" and "remarks:" attributes:

descr: RIPE-NCC IPRA Maintainer for all direct resources remarks: Never send email to<rs-enduser@ripe.net> Local Internet Registries (LIRs)or End Users that need to update an object only maintained by this maintainer should write to<lir-help@ripe.net> If you are not a member you should send e-mail to<ncc@ripe.net>.

If your object is maintained by this, you probably cannot change the maintainer even if you wanted to. :)

Try e-mailing one of the two accounts there, lir-help@ripe.net or ncc@ripe.net, and I am sure you'll get the help you need.

-- Shane