- db-help - mailman.ripe.net

RIPE Database Webupdates
by Yevgeniya S. Mateshova 27 Jun '11

27 Jun '11

Hello! In your database has changed, I want to remove one object from the database, but could't find updated instructions. thereafter thereafter What to do next? RegID: kz.kaztranscom Best regards, Yevgeniya Mateshova tel.: + 7 727 2377394 cid:image001.gif@01C8BCD1.CFFCFF30

1 0

db assistance
by Kevin Pack 04 Mar '11

04 Mar '11

ripe, I'm attempting to view all inetnums within an allocation we have. What is the correct syntax to view all inetnums within a specific range of IPs? For example, I'm trying to view all inetnums we have submitted for 62.73.160.0/19 Thank you Kevin Pack Customer Engineering NTT Communications - Global IP Network e: kpack(a)us.ntt.net | t: 214-915-1366 | voip: 1066

3 3

Re: db assistance
by Vesna Manojlovic 04 Mar '11

04 Mar '11

Hi Kevin, On 3/3/11 8:54 PM, Kevin Pack wrote: > ripe, > > I'm attempting to view all inetnums within an allocation we have. What > is the correct syntax to view all inetnums within a specific range of > IPs? For example, I'm trying to view all inetnums we have submitted for > 62.73.160.0/19 You can do whois -r -m 62.73.160.0/19 and/or whois -r -M -K 62.73.160.0/19 For the explanation of flags: http://www.ripe.net/data-tools/support/documentation/queries-quick-ref For more information, please see RIPE Database documentation http://www.ripe.net/data-tools/support/documentation Vesna Manojlovic RIPE NCC Trainer & Lecturer

1 0

RPSL general practical benefits
by Tourneur Henry-Nicolas 13 Dec '10

13 Dec '10

Hello everybody, As explained previously in another thread, I intended the RPSL RIPE training a few days ago. While writing down a summary for my colleagues, I though about some questions. One general considerations first: Do you know very practical benefits/positive impact of using RPSL? I mean, of course documenting is good, allowing the use of RtConfig might be good too but I'm interessed on your experience about which impact this could have on a network. When attending the course I saw one very practical example. We operate a smal B2B ISP (and we should need to use RPSL). Actually, we do not describe our peers (except 2 upstreams). The result is that the speedtest.net website auto-select an Amsterdam server and so, the customer doesn't have the expect result. Beside the fact that speedtest.net isn't the best way to test your bw, describing our peers would let this website to autoselect a nearest server. This is what I would call a very practical and positive impact on our network. Do anybody have similar experience with other services? Another question :) We are present at the FreeBIX but this IX let the participants use a route server allowing for automatic peerings with anybody that has an open-peering policy. With such an environement, new peering establishement is almost transparent to us. In this scenario, we can't integrate this with RPSL, no? Thanks in advance for your precious advices :) Henry-Nicolas Tourneur.

1 0

as-set and origin as usage
by nicolas 13 Dec '10

13 Dec '10

To protect your privacy, remote images are blocked in this message. Display images Hello everybody, A few days ago I intended a RIPE RPSL training. Now I'm writing a summary for my colleagues and there something I don't remember perfectly, it's about the as-set object. Using an as-set object, I can either start its name with an origin as or directly put the name (ex. AS-Customers). Under which circumstance should I specify the origin AS? Thank you very much for your help, Regards,

2 2

RIPE-NCC-END-MNT in IPv6 PI
by Alexander Zubkov 02 Nov '10

02 Nov '10

Hi. Should I preserve this: mnt-by: RIPE-NCC-END-MNT mnt-lower: RIPE-NCC-END-MNT in my inet6num ASSIGNED PI? And if I should, why not this forced by database update validator?

2 6

Re: RIPE-NCC-END-MNT in IPv6 PI
by Alexander Zubkov 01 Nov '10

01 Nov '10

Thank You. :) But is there some policies or other stuff that says it? On 11/01/2010 10:40 PM, Jussi Sallinen wrote: > No, you shouldnt delete those :-) > > -- > -Jussi Sallinen > +358407007600 > jussi(a)unikko.org > > On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 10:17:22PM +0300, Alexander Zubkov wrote: >> My object is maintained by my maintainer also, I have no problem with >> access to it. >> The question was: can I delete RIPE-NCC-END-MNT? Actually, I've deleted >> it successfully and got no error. But may be I shouldn't do that? :) >> >> On 11/01/2010 10:06 PM, Shane Kerr wrote: >>> Alexander, >>> >>> On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 21:47 +0300, Alexander Zubkov wrote: >>>> Hi. >>>> Should I preserve this: >>>> >>>> mnt-by: RIPE-NCC-END-MNT >>>> mnt-lower: RIPE-NCC-END-MNT >>>> >>>> in my inet6num ASSIGNED PI? >>>> And if I should, why not this forced by database update validator? >>> >>> The RIPE-NCC-END-MNT object has the following "descr:" and "remarks:" >>> attributes: >>> >>> descr: RIPE-NCC IPRA Maintainer for all direct resources >>> remarks: Never send email to<rs-enduser(a)ripe.net> >>> Local Internet Registries (LIRs)or End Users that need >>> to update an object only maintained by this maintainer >>> should write to<lir-help(a)ripe.net> >>> If you are not a member you should send e-mail >>> to<ncc(a)ripe.net>. >>> >>> If your object is maintained by this, you probably cannot change the >>> maintainer even if you wanted to. :) >>> >>> Try e-mailing one of the two accounts there, lir-help(a)ripe.net or >>> ncc(a)ripe.net, and I am sure you'll get the help you need. >>> >>> -- >>> Shane >>> >> >

1 0

nic-hdl
by gun 12 Aug '10

12 Aug '10

Hi I want to register more nic-hdl for my AS8678. Could you please explain me which Unit is responsible for and how ? Gun Gökçearslan Ankara University IT department

1 0

routing via single provider
by alexander lunyov 19 Jul '10

19 Jul '10

Hello everybody. We are the new LIR, recently received our first allocation and assignment. For now we have connection with only one service provider, so we can't register our AS-NUM (but we will do in near future). How do we establish routing via this provider? And after that, if we establish routing via this single provider, and then connect to another provider, register our AS-NUM, how fast and easy will it change - from direct routing to BGP? Will it be noticed by users? Thank you in advance. -- Best regards Alexander Lunyov OJSC RTC

1 0

Weird allocation record for 192.114.0.0
by Lucas Wang 16 Jul '10

16 Jul '10

I was doing some processing on the address allocation records published on ripe's ftp websites: ftp://ftp.ripe.net/pub/stats/ripencc And I noticed that for some records the db is bizarre. For instance, the address block starting from 192.114.0.0 appeared as as ripencc|IL|ipv4|192.114.0.0|327680|20010306|assigned on allocation files before 03/15/2005. Then it disappeared for several years, and popped out on 06/27/2009 as ripencc|EU|ipv4|192.114.0.0|327680|19930901|assigned Note that the country code and allocation date has been changed. It doesn't make sense if the address block was returned because allocation date(19930901) on 06/27/2009 was even before the previous record(20010306). And on 07/31/2009, it shrunk into a smaller block: ripencc|EU|ipv4|192.114.0.0|21504|19930901|assigned Does this mean part of it was returned? Any answer regarding how the allocation files are produced or whether the cases mentioned above are errors are greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance, Lucas Lucas(Jiangzhe) Wang

2 1