Thank You. :)
But is there some policies or other stuff that says it?
On 11/01/2010 10:40 PM, Jussi Sallinen wrote:
> No, you shouldnt delete those :-)
>
> --
> -Jussi Sallinen
> +358407007600
> jussi(a)unikko.org
>
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 10:17:22PM +0300, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
>> My object is maintained by my maintainer also, I have no problem with
>> access to it.
>> The question was: can I delete RIPE-NCC-END-MNT? Actually, I've deleted
>> it successfully and got no error. But may be I shouldn't do that? :)
>>
>> On 11/01/2010 10:06 PM, Shane Kerr wrote:
>>> Alexander,
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 21:47 +0300, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
>>>> Hi.
>>>> Should I preserve this:
>>>>
>>>> mnt-by: RIPE-NCC-END-MNT
>>>> mnt-lower: RIPE-NCC-END-MNT
>>>>
>>>> in my inet6num ASSIGNED PI?
>>>> And if I should, why not this forced by database update validator?
>>>
>>> The RIPE-NCC-END-MNT object has the following "descr:" and "remarks:"
>>> attributes:
>>>
>>> descr: RIPE-NCC IPRA Maintainer for all direct resources
>>> remarks: Never send email to<rs-enduser(a)ripe.net>
>>> Local Internet Registries (LIRs)or End Users that need
>>> to update an object only maintained by this maintainer
>>> should write to<lir-help(a)ripe.net>
>>> If you are not a member you should send e-mail
>>> to<ncc(a)ripe.net>.
>>>
>>> If your object is maintained by this, you probably cannot change the
>>> maintainer even if you wanted to. :)
>>>
>>> Try e-mailing one of the two accounts there, lir-help(a)ripe.net or
>>> ncc(a)ripe.net, and I am sure you'll get the help you need.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Shane
>>>
>>
>
