RIPE NCC Contribution to the CSTD Working Group on Enhanced Cooperation
Dear colleagues, One of the outcomes of last year’s 10-year review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) was the formation of a Working Group on Enhanced Cooperation on Public Policy Issues Pertaining to the Internet (WGEC). Established under the United Nations’ Commission on Science and Technology for Development (CSTD), the Working Group was set up in response to the feeling expressed by some UN Member States that there was a need to "develop recommendations on how to further implement enhanced cooperation as envisioned in the Tunis Agenda." More information on the Working Group is available at: http://unctad.org/en/Pages/CSTD/WGEC-2016-to-2018.aspx Coming out of the Working Group’s initial meeting in September, there was an open call for contributions in response to two questions:
- What are the high level characteristics of enhanced cooperation? - Taking into consideration the work of the previous WGEC and the Tunis Agenda, particularly paragraphs 69-71, what kind of recommendations should we consider?
Working closely with one of the technical community members of the Working Group, Nick Ashton-Hart, the RIPE NCC developed and submitted a document responding to these questions: https://www.ripe.net/participate/internet-governance/multi-stakeholder-engag... In summary, the document notes that, while cooperation amongst all stakeholders is vital in developing Internet capacity, it is important that these efforts focus on practical benefits, and that they be minimally distortive or disruptive to the shared platform that is the Internet. The Working Group will hold its next meeting on 26-27 January 2017 in Geneva, where it will consider the contributions received and the way forward for its work. Happy, as always, to discuss any questions or comments. Meanwhile, best wishes to those celebrating Christmas/New Year in the coming days and weeks! Cheers, Chris Buckridge External Relations Manager RIPE NCC
Thank you for this. Could you please explain the process that was used to develop this paper, who approved it, and why (apparently) some members of this list were consulted but not others? Thanks and best, Richard
-----Original Message----- From: cooperation-wg [mailto:cooperation-wg-bounces@ripe.net] On Behalf Of Chris Buckridge Sent: Friday, December 23, 2016 11:43 To: RIPE Cooperation Working Group Subject: [cooperation-wg] RIPE NCC Contribution to the CSTD Working Group on Enhanced Cooperation
Dear colleagues,
One of the outcomes of last year’s 10-year review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) was the formation of a Working Group on Enhanced Cooperation on Public Policy Issues Pertaining to the Internet (WGEC). Established under the United Nations’ Commission on Science and Technology for Development (CSTD), the Working Group was set up in response to the feeling expressed by some UN Member States that there was a need to "develop recommendations on how to further implement enhanced cooperation as envisioned in the Tunis Agenda."
More information on the Working Group is available at: http://unctad.org/en/Pages/CSTD/WGEC-2016-to-2018.aspx
Coming out of the Working Group’s initial meeting in September, there was an open call for contributions in response to two questions:
- What are the high level characteristics of enhanced cooperation? - Taking into consideration the work of the previous WGEC and the Tunis Agenda, particularly paragraphs 69-71, what kind of recommendations should we consider?
Working closely with one of the technical community members of the Working Group, Nick Ashton-Hart, the RIPE NCC developed and submitted a document responding to these questions: https://www.ripe.net/participate/internet-governance/multi-stakeholder- engagement/wsis/ripencc-ecwg-submission-201612.pdf
In summary, the document notes that, while cooperation amongst all stakeholders is vital in developing Internet capacity, it is important that these efforts focus on practical benefits, and that they be minimally distortive or disruptive to the shared platform that is the Internet.
The Working Group will hold its next meeting on 26-27 January 2017 in Geneva, where it will consider the contributions received and the way forward for its work.
Happy, as always, to discuss any questions or comments. Meanwhile, best wishes to those celebrating Christmas/New Year in the coming days and weeks!
Cheers,
Chris Buckridge External Relations Manager RIPE NCC
Hi Richard, Thanks for your comment. This was a document developed and submitted by the RIPE NCC (on behalf of the organisation, rather than the RIPE community), which I hope was explicit in the document itself. I believe that the content was in line with the principles of the RIPE community, but as we took up the opportunity to respond quite late in the comment window, it was not possible to fully develop a response with the community. If community members feel that more substantial RIPE community input to the WGEC is warranted, I am sure that there will be future opportunities for input (either via formal submission or in communications to the technical community members of the Working Group). Incidentally, the technical community participants in the Working Group (as selected via a process facilitated by the Internet Society) are: • Nick Ashton-Hart (GCSP) • Nigel Hickson (ICANN) • Constance Bommelaer (ISOC) • Janvier Noulaye (University of Yaoundé) • Jovan Kurbalija (DiploFoundation) I hope that this is useful. Best regards, Chris
On 23 Dec 2016, at 11:46, Richard Hill <rhill@hill-a.ch> wrote:
Thank you for this.
Could you please explain the process that was used to develop this paper, who approved it, and why (apparently) some members of this list were consulted but not others?
Thanks and best, Richard
-----Original Message----- From: cooperation-wg [mailto:cooperation-wg-bounces@ripe.net] On Behalf Of Chris Buckridge Sent: Friday, December 23, 2016 11:43 To: RIPE Cooperation Working Group Subject: [cooperation-wg] RIPE NCC Contribution to the CSTD Working Group on Enhanced Cooperation
Dear colleagues,
One of the outcomes of last year’s 10-year review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) was the formation of a Working Group on Enhanced Cooperation on Public Policy Issues Pertaining to the Internet (WGEC). Established under the United Nations’ Commission on Science and Technology for Development (CSTD), the Working Group was set up in response to the feeling expressed by some UN Member States that there was a need to "develop recommendations on how to further implement enhanced cooperation as envisioned in the Tunis Agenda."
More information on the Working Group is available at: http://unctad.org/en/Pages/CSTD/WGEC-2016-to-2018.aspx
Coming out of the Working Group’s initial meeting in September, there was an open call for contributions in response to two questions:
- What are the high level characteristics of enhanced cooperation? - Taking into consideration the work of the previous WGEC and the Tunis Agenda, particularly paragraphs 69-71, what kind of recommendations should we consider?
Working closely with one of the technical community members of the Working Group, Nick Ashton-Hart, the RIPE NCC developed and submitted a document responding to these questions: https://www.ripe.net/participate/internet-governance/multi-stakeholder- engagement/wsis/ripencc-ecwg-submission-201612.pdf
In summary, the document notes that, while cooperation amongst all stakeholders is vital in developing Internet capacity, it is important that these efforts focus on practical benefits, and that they be minimally distortive or disruptive to the shared platform that is the Internet.
The Working Group will hold its next meeting on 26-27 January 2017 in Geneva, where it will consider the contributions received and the way forward for its work.
Happy, as always, to discuss any questions or comments. Meanwhile, best wishes to those celebrating Christmas/New Year in the coming days and weeks!
Cheers,
Chris Buckridge External Relations Manager RIPE NCC
Dear Chris, Thank you for this. Indeed your reply is very useful. But I would like one further clarification: were all five of the technical community participants in WGEC consulted, or only some of them? If so, which? Thanks and best, Richard
-----Original Message----- From: Chris Buckridge [mailto:chrisb@ripe.net] Sent: Friday, December 23, 2016 12:11 To: Richard Hill Cc: RIPE Cooperation Working Group Subject: Re: [cooperation-wg] RIPE NCC Contribution to the CSTD Working Group on Enhanced Cooperation
Hi Richard,
Thanks for your comment.
This was a document developed and submitted by the RIPE NCC (on behalf of the organisation, rather than the RIPE community), which I hope was explicit in the document itself. I believe that the content was in line with the principles of the RIPE community, but as we took up the opportunity to respond quite late in the comment window, it was not possible to fully develop a response with the community.
If community members feel that more substantial RIPE community input to the WGEC is warranted, I am sure that there will be future opportunities for input (either via formal submission or in communications to the technical community members of the Working Group).
Incidentally, the technical community participants in the Working Group (as selected via a process facilitated by the Internet Society) are:
• Nick Ashton-Hart (GCSP) • Nigel Hickson (ICANN) • Constance Bommelaer (ISOC) • Janvier Noulaye (University of Yaoundé) • Jovan Kurbalija (DiploFoundation)
I hope that this is useful.
Best regards, Chris
On 23 Dec 2016, at 11:46, Richard Hill <rhill@hill-a.ch> wrote:
Thank you for this.
Could you please explain the process that was used to develop this paper, who approved it, and why (apparently) some members of this list were consulted but not others?
Thanks and best, Richard
-----Original Message----- From: cooperation-wg [mailto:cooperation-wg-bounces@ripe.net] On Behalf Of Chris Buckridge Sent: Friday, December 23, 2016 11:43 To: RIPE Cooperation Working Group Subject: [cooperation-wg] RIPE NCC Contribution to the CSTD Working Group on Enhanced Cooperation
Dear colleagues,
One of the outcomes of last year’s 10-year review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) was the formation of a Working Group on Enhanced Cooperation on Public Policy Issues Pertaining to the Internet (WGEC). Established under the United Nations’ Commission on Science and Technology for Development (CSTD), the Working Group was set up in response to the feeling expressed by some UN Member States that there was a need to "develop recommendations on how to further implement enhanced cooperation as envisioned in the Tunis Agenda."
More information on the Working Group is available at: http://unctad.org/en/Pages/CSTD/WGEC-2016-to-2018.aspx
Coming out of the Working Group’s initial meeting in September, there was an open call for contributions in response to two questions:
- What are the high level characteristics of enhanced cooperation? - Taking into consideration the work of the previous WGEC and the Tunis Agenda, particularly paragraphs 69-71, what kind of recommendations should we consider?
Working closely with one of the technical community members of the Working Group, Nick Ashton-Hart, the RIPE NCC developed and submitted a document responding to these questions: https://www.ripe.net/participate/internet-governance/multi- stakeholde r- engagement/wsis/ripencc-ecwg-submission-201612.pdf
In summary, the document notes that, while cooperation amongst all stakeholders is vital in developing Internet capacity, it is important that these efforts focus on practical benefits, and that they be minimally distortive or disruptive to the shared platform that is the Internet.
The Working Group will hold its next meeting on 26-27 January 2017 in Geneva, where it will consider the contributions received and the way forward for its work.
Happy, as always, to discuss any questions or comments. Meanwhile, best wishes to those celebrating Christmas/New Year in the coming days and weeks!
Cheers,
Chris Buckridge External Relations Manager RIPE NCC
Dear Richard, No, our only communication on this specific submission was with Nick Ashton-Hart, and it was of an informal nature, in that he was able to provide perspective on the kind of messaging that might be useful in the discussions going forward. But as noted, this submission is explicitly made on behalf of the RIPE NCC alone, with the hope that it will contribute to productive discussions in the WGEC. Best regards, Chris
On 23 Dec 2016, at 12:13, Richard Hill <rhill@hill-a.ch> wrote:
Dear Chris,
Thank you for this. Indeed your reply is very useful. But I would like one further clarification: were all five of the technical community participants in WGEC consulted, or only some of them? If so, which?
Thanks and best, Richard
-----Original Message----- From: Chris Buckridge [mailto:chrisb@ripe.net] Sent: Friday, December 23, 2016 12:11 To: Richard Hill Cc: RIPE Cooperation Working Group Subject: Re: [cooperation-wg] RIPE NCC Contribution to the CSTD Working Group on Enhanced Cooperation
Hi Richard,
Thanks for your comment.
This was a document developed and submitted by the RIPE NCC (on behalf of the organisation, rather than the RIPE community), which I hope was explicit in the document itself. I believe that the content was in line with the principles of the RIPE community, but as we took up the opportunity to respond quite late in the comment window, it was not possible to fully develop a response with the community.
If community members feel that more substantial RIPE community input to the WGEC is warranted, I am sure that there will be future opportunities for input (either via formal submission or in communications to the technical community members of the Working Group).
Incidentally, the technical community participants in the Working Group (as selected via a process facilitated by the Internet Society) are:
• Nick Ashton-Hart (GCSP) • Nigel Hickson (ICANN) • Constance Bommelaer (ISOC) • Janvier Noulaye (University of Yaoundé) • Jovan Kurbalija (DiploFoundation)
I hope that this is useful.
Best regards, Chris
On 23 Dec 2016, at 11:46, Richard Hill <rhill@hill-a.ch> wrote:
Thank you for this.
Could you please explain the process that was used to develop this paper, who approved it, and why (apparently) some members of this list were consulted but not others?
Thanks and best, Richard
-----Original Message----- From: cooperation-wg [mailto:cooperation-wg-bounces@ripe.net] On Behalf Of Chris Buckridge Sent: Friday, December 23, 2016 11:43 To: RIPE Cooperation Working Group Subject: [cooperation-wg] RIPE NCC Contribution to the CSTD Working Group on Enhanced Cooperation
Dear colleagues,
One of the outcomes of last year’s 10-year review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) was the formation of a Working Group on Enhanced Cooperation on Public Policy Issues Pertaining to the Internet (WGEC). Established under the United Nations’ Commission on Science and Technology for Development (CSTD), the Working Group was set up in response to the feeling expressed by some UN Member States that there was a need to "develop recommendations on how to further implement enhanced cooperation as envisioned in the Tunis Agenda."
More information on the Working Group is available at: http://unctad.org/en/Pages/CSTD/WGEC-2016-to-2018.aspx
Coming out of the Working Group’s initial meeting in September, there was an open call for contributions in response to two questions:
- What are the high level characteristics of enhanced cooperation? - Taking into consideration the work of the previous WGEC and the Tunis Agenda, particularly paragraphs 69-71, what kind of recommendations should we consider?
Working closely with one of the technical community members of the Working Group, Nick Ashton-Hart, the RIPE NCC developed and submitted a document responding to these questions: https://www.ripe.net/participate/internet-governance/multi- stakeholde r- engagement/wsis/ripencc-ecwg-submission-201612.pdf
In summary, the document notes that, while cooperation amongst all stakeholders is vital in developing Internet capacity, it is important that these efforts focus on practical benefits, and that they be minimally distortive or disruptive to the shared platform that is the Internet.
The Working Group will hold its next meeting on 26-27 January 2017 in Geneva, where it will consider the contributions received and the way forward for its work.
Happy, as always, to discuss any questions or comments. Meanwhile, best wishes to those celebrating Christmas/New Year in the coming days and weeks!
Cheers,
Chris Buckridge External Relations Manager RIPE NCC
I find it interesting how the term “enhanced cooperation” has been interpreted in ways that I think are quite different to what was in the minds of at least some of the people who I understand originally proposed it. In EU relations “enhanced cooperation” has a specific meaning. It was introduced in the Treaty of Amsterdam: so akin to a "term of art”, if you will. Enhanced cooperation, in the EU, was not meant to imply simply better cooperation: it was about differentiated cooperation. In that environment it was and is about some, not all, member states cooperating more fully, more closely, on certain items even in the absence of a wider consensus. So the idea was that, even in a UN-related context, certain states could cooperate more closely, even in the absence of more general agreement? Given the significant on-going restructuring in terms of international relationships one might imagine a shift back to the original intent. Happy holidays! Gordon https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enhanced_cooperation
On 23 Dec 2016, at 11:42, Chris Buckridge <chrisb@ripe.net> wrote:
Dear colleagues,
One of the outcomes of last year’s 10-year review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) was the formation of a Working Group on Enhanced Cooperation on Public Policy Issues Pertaining to the Internet (WGEC). Established under the United Nations’ Commission on Science and Technology for Development (CSTD), the Working Group was set up in response to the feeling expressed by some UN Member States that there was a need to "develop recommendations on how to further implement enhanced cooperation as envisioned in the Tunis Agenda."
More information on the Working Group is available at: http://unctad.org/en/Pages/CSTD/WGEC-2016-to-2018.aspx
Coming out of the Working Group’s initial meeting in September, there was an open call for contributions in response to two questions:
- What are the high level characteristics of enhanced cooperation? - Taking into consideration the work of the previous WGEC and the Tunis Agenda, particularly paragraphs 69-71, what kind of recommendations should we consider?
Working closely with one of the technical community members of the Working Group, Nick Ashton-Hart, the RIPE NCC developed and submitted a document responding to these questions: https://www.ripe.net/participate/internet-governance/multi-stakeholder-engag...
In summary, the document notes that, while cooperation amongst all stakeholders is vital in developing Internet capacity, it is important that these efforts focus on practical benefits, and that they be minimally distortive or disruptive to the shared platform that is the Internet.
The Working Group will hold its next meeting on 26-27 January 2017 in Geneva, where it will consider the contributions received and the way forward for its work.
Happy, as always, to discuss any questions or comments. Meanwhile, best wishes to those celebrating Christmas/New Year in the coming days and weeks!
Cheers,
Chris Buckridge External Relations Manager RIPE NCC
participants (3)
-
Chris Buckridge -
Gordon Lennox -
Richard Hill