On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Gordon Lennox <gordon.lennox.13@gmail.com> wrote: <snip>
Where I diverge a little from Jim, and the topic has come up recently on this list, is when it comes to outreach and to what extent co-chairs are supposed to represent the WG and indeed RIPE elsewhere. <snip> This area is a bit different from others and maybe particularly when it comes to outreach where NCC has been very much involved. <snip> Where I am less comfortable is about outreach being part of the job description of WG Co-chairs. I also wonder to what extent participants in the WG can also take on this kind of task. I think this needs to be discussed further. In Madrid when we have our full complement of co-chairs?
... may I ask what we expect our chairs todo? Help RIPE NCC in the outreach, or help in the outreach-job by let all the other around RIPE have an arena to meet the community? If a chair is doing outreach, who are a chair of this WG representing? I would say none, whoever it is cannot represent us. Difficult. -- Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE rogerj@gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger@jorgensen.no