I would like to draw your attention to a particular item in the IANAXFER proposal: It would be appreciated if more community members found some time between the festivities to read and comment on the proposals. -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [NRO-IANAXFER] NRO-NC role in Review Committee Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 15:00:56 +0200 From: Alan Barrett <apb@cequrux.com> To: ianaxfer@nro.net There has been a suggestion that the work of the "Review Committee" proposed in the CRISP draft should be handled by the NRO-NC, or alternatively, that the chair of the NRO-NC should be co-opted to serve on the Review Committee. The CRISP Team believes that is would be wise to to keep the operational performance review process independent of the policy development process. Because the NRO-NC (or ASO-AC) has a role in global policy development, we think that the proposed Review Committee should be independent of the NRO-NC. The draft proposal says "The NRO Executive Council shall establish a Review Committee that will advise and assist the NRO Executive Council in its periodic review. Any such Review Committee should be a team composed of representatives from each RIR region ...". The CRISP Team has not discussed how many members the Review Committee might have, or what procedure the NRO EC might follow in choosing the members. --apb (Alan Barrett) _______________________________________________ ianaxfer mailing list ianaxfer@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer