Il 26/01/2014 17:27, Roland Perry ha scritto:
In message <D1AC4482BED7C04DAC43491E9A9DBEC3901E9E87@BK-EXCHMBX01.blacknight.local>, at 15:08:24 on Sun, 26 Jan 2014, Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele@blacknight.com> writes
And I thought this paper was about domains more than domain registries?
Well, actually both of them are covered in my draft.
Yes, which is why the paper should positively avoid the inclusion of confusing examples such as domains operated by I* entities.
Within the document I used the example.com domain just to give readers a name which was "neutral" and easy to remember; my intention was not to use the example.com "technical background" such as the real NSs operated by IANA. Anyway if you believe that it could confuse more expert readers it can be replaced with another, as suggested by Roland. In this case maybe it could be useful to find as many sample domains as the cases covered by the document, each domain reflecting the specific technical configuration each time described. My only fear is that this may lead to a more difficult reading for non-expert people (who are the real audience). -- Pier Carlo Chiodi http://pierky.com/aboutme The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of any organization, entity or committee to which I may hold a position.