at the risk of derailing the thread, what *does* anticensorship taste like? (stated more plainly: I don't follow.) On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Roland Perry < roland@internetpolicyagency.com> wrote:
In message <528E1E7B.60000@inex.ie>, at 14:53:47 on Thu, 21 Nov 2013, Nick Hilliard <nick@inex.ie> writes
Where is the "running code" when it come to (eg) denying IXPs the right to
have provider-independent IPv6 addresses (as was the case for some considerable time).
that particular policy bug was fixed in the summer of 2001. In the 12.5 years since then, I think we can reasonably claim that the RIPE community has built up a vibrant interest in actively managing its addressing policies using bottom up principals.
And I don't dispute that for a moment.
Currently I'm particularly interested in getting the "underbottom" (that's users and their representatives, rather than typically the layer above, their connectivity suppliers) more involved in that process. It's a bit like "civil society, but without the anticensorship flavour". -- Roland Perry
-- Meredith Whittaker Program Manager, Google Research Google NYC