![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/120853319a3409d3d29fd7e4e88031bb.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
In message <528E1E7B.60000@inex.ie>, at 14:53:47 on Thu, 21 Nov 2013, Nick Hilliard <nick@inex.ie> writes
Where is the "running code" when it come to (eg) denying IXPs the right to have provider-independent IPv6 addresses (as was the case for some considerable time).
that particular policy bug was fixed in the summer of 2001. In the 12.5 years since then, I think we can reasonably claim that the RIPE community has built up a vibrant interest in actively managing its addressing policies using bottom up principals.
And I don't dispute that for a moment. Currently I'm particularly interested in getting the "underbottom" (that's users and their representatives, rather than typically the layer above, their connectivity suppliers) more involved in that process. It's a bit like "civil society, but without the anticensorship flavour". -- Roland Perry