I generally agree with you. But I think we need to discuss "out-reach" more.

Representing the WG in other fora has proved problematic in the past for obvious reasons.

I also tend to think that in any case "out-reach" has too be something for the whole WG and not an additional task just for the co-chairs.

Gordon

On 26 May 2016 at 14:19, Brian Nisbet <brian.nisbet@heanet.ie> wrote:
Afternoon,

There has been a lot of discussion on list and at the session today about the "job requirements" of a WG Co-Chair, especially in relation to how well they know the community or how embedded they may be in it.

There is precedent for situations where a WG's Co-Chairs may be a mix of people who are long standing members of the community and "subject matter experts" who are more recently arrived. Of course those who are more recently arrived do need to make a commitment to becoming suitably involved, but we need to be careful about perfect being the enemy of done.

This is especially relevant, I think, in Co-operation where the whole point is outreach and bringing more stakeholder groups into the community, or at least into contact.

I make no comment about the current candidates for Co-Chair(s) of the WG, it is more of a general observation that should be taken into account for the discussion.

Thanks,

Brian

--
Brian Nisbet, Network Operations Manager
HEAnet Limited, Ireland's Education and Research Network
1st Floor, 5 George's Dock, IFSC, Dublin 1
Registered in Ireland, no 275301  tel: +35316609040
web: http://www.heanet.ie/