On 06.06.2016 20.23, Roger Jørgensen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Gordon Lennox
<gordon.lennox.13@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
Where I diverge a little from Jim, and the topic has come up recently on this list, is when it comes to outreach and to what extent co-chairs are supposed to represent the WG and indeed RIPE elsewhere.
<snip>
This area is a bit different from others and maybe particularly when it comes to outreach where NCC has been very much involved.
<snip>
Where I am less comfortable is about outreach being part of the job description of WG Co-chairs. I also wonder to what extent participants in the WG can also take on this kind of task. I think this needs to be discussed further. In Madrid when we have our full complement of co-chairs?
... may I ask what we expect our chairs todo? Help RIPE NCC in the
outreach, or help in the outreach-job by let all the other around RIPE
have an arena to meet the community?
I thought I shared this already: but here comes
https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-542

Cut and paste most relevant parts:

5. Policy Development Process (PDP) Responsibilities

WG Chairs are expected to:

(...)

6. RIPE Meetings Responsibilities

i) General/Plenary

WG Chairs are expected to:


ii) Working Group Specific

WG chairs are expected to:







If a chair is doing outreach, who are a chair of this WG representing?
I would say none, whoever it is cannot represent us. Difficult.
Representation is not part of the role description.
Chairing the group is.

-hph

-- 
Hans Petter Holen
Mobile +47 45 06 60 54 | hph@oslo.net | http://hph.oslo.net