March 2024 - cooperation-wg - mailman.ripe.net

Internet Governance Webinar - PP22 Debrief
by Gergana Petrova 23 Oct '24

23 Oct '24

Hi all, A reminder that RIPE NCC's Internet governance webinar is taking place tomorrow at 10:00-11:00 CET / 09:00-10:00 UTC. Registration is open to all: https://learning.ripe.net/w/courses/29-internet-governance-webinar During the first part would cover more general Internet governance topics and in the second we will debrief you on the recent ITU Plenipotentiary Conference (PP22). If you are interested, please register. Also, feel free to forward this invitation to anyone whom you think might find it useful. Best regards, Gergana -- Gergana Petrova Community Development Manager RIPE NCC

1 2

Discuss ISO-3166 mark TAIWAN as a Provinces of China on the RIPE NCC website
by SteveYi Yo 03 Apr '24

03 Apr '24

Dear Members of the Cooperation Working Group, I am Tsung-Yi Yu from Taiwan, a user of RIPE NCC's services since 2019 with a deep interest in Global Internet Governance. I wish to address the classification of Taiwan on RIPE NCC's website, particularly regarding Country Codes and RIRs: https://www.ripe.net/membership/member-support/list-of-members/list-of-coun…. Taiwan is listed as a "Province of China," which may cause confusion and misinterpretation. Some of the Individuals and legal entities in Taiwan are using RIPE NCC services like Atlas/RIPEstat. However, the current classification does not accurately reflect Taiwan's status. I reached out to RIPE NCC Support, learning that changes to this classification are currently not possible since they have already implemented the ISO-3166. Notably, the NRO/APNIC does not refer to Taiwan as a "Province of China" but rather by its "economy": https://www.nro.net/list-of-country-codes-in-the-apnic-region/ and https://www.apnic.net/about-apnic/corporate-documents/documents/corporate/a…. This approach avoids political sensitivities and ensures clarity. As I know, the RIPE NCC is operating under a Multi-Stakeholder model (community), and follows different guidelines from entities like the UN/IGF. Even the ICANN, does not label Taiwan as a "Province of China" outside its GAC committee. That's why I would like to discuss this in here and wish the RIPE NCC to reconsider its classification of Taiwan, promoting accuracy and respect in global internet governance. Please feel free to share your opinion. Thank you! Best, Tsung-Yi Yu

4 9

IS3C consultation on an alternative narrative to deploy Internet standards
by Wout de Natris 11 Mar '24

11 Mar '24

Dear colleagues, IGF DC IS3C invites you to participate in the consultation on positively enhancing the deployment of two Internet standards: DNSSEC and RPKI. You are invited to answer either of these questions: Do the arguments used to favor a positive decision, convince you to order deployment within your organisation or from your service provider? / Do they assist you to convince decision takers in your organisation to invest in security by design? You are invited to share your views and arguments with IS3C’s expert team and have been granted commenting rights in this document to do so. The consultation runs from 11 March to 12PM UTC, Friday 5 April 2024. Your contribution will be taken into consideration when finalising the text before publication this spring. Here is the link to the Google Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YYq3ie9D03L1Z5ssgPbWKV5becUgNw0h7_fmm9x… We hope to receive your views so we can present the most convincing arguments to deploy DNSSEC, RPKI and all other security-related Internet standards and ICT best practices. (FYI, this project us sponsored by ICANN and RIPE NCC.) Kind regards, Wout de Natris IS3C: Making the Internet more secure and safer

2 1

Consultation on enhancing the deployment of DNSSEC and RPKI - open until 5 April 2024
by rbosc 11 Mar '24

11 Mar '24

Dear colleagues, IGF DC IS3C invites you to participate in the consultation on positively enhancing the deployment of two Internet standards: DNSSEC and RPKI. You are invited to answer either of these questions: Do the arguments used to favour a positive decision, convince you to order deployment within your organisation or from your service provider? / Do they assist you to convince decision takers in your organisation to invest in security by design? You are invited to share your views and arguments with IS3C's expert team and have been granted commenting rights in this document to do so. The consultation runs from 11 March to 12PM UTC, Friday 5 April 2024. Your contribution will be taken into consideration when finalising the text before publication this spring. Here is the link to the Google Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YYq3ie9D03L1Z5ssgPbWKV5becUgNw0h7_fmm9x… We hope to receive your views so we can make this the most convincing argument to deploy DNSSEC, RPKI, and all other security-related Internet standards and ICT best practices. Kind regards, RIPE NCC on behalf of Wout de Natris IS3C: Making the Internet more secure and safer

1 0

Re: [cooperation-wg] cooperation-wg Digest, Vol 138, Issue 5
by Corinne Cath 10 Mar '24

10 Mar '24

Interesting read, I was wondering whether anyone in this community knows how much weight is behind it--given that the importance of white papers coming out of the EC differs. Kind regards, Corinne Cath On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 12:00 PM <cooperation-wg-request(a)ripe.net> wrote: > Send cooperation-wg mailing list submissions to > cooperation-wg(a)ripe.net > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/cooperation-wg > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > cooperation-wg-request(a)ripe.net > > You can reach the person managing the list at > cooperation-wg-owner(a)ripe.net > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of cooperation-wg digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. White Paper and Public Consultation on "Europe's Digital > Infrastructure Needs" (Romain Bosc) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 11:48:51 +0100 > From: Romain Bosc <rbosc(a)ripe.net> > To: cooperation-wg(a)ripe.net > Subject: [cooperation-wg] White Paper and Public Consultation on > "Europe's Digital Infrastructure Needs" > Message-ID: <D86ADE1D-8BF8-4DBA-B2A5-D9997A024AC3(a)ripe.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Dear Colleagues, > > Last week, the European Commission published a White Paper on ?How to > master Europe?s digital infrastructure needs??: > https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/white-paper-how-master-eur… > > A public consultation is open and running until 30 June 2024: > https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/1… > > The White Paper highlights some challenges and opportunities for the > rollout of future connectivity networks and presents possible scenarios. > Main takeaways and key objectives the European Commission is pushing > forward through this initiative include: > Making the telecom sector more attractive for investors and address > ?investments needs? for the deployment of future networks; > Improving harmonisation of spectrum authorisation procedures and reduce > administrative burdens across EU member states; > Suggesting a revision of the European Electronic Communications Code > (EESC) while seeking ways to reduce market fragmentation; > Enhancing the resilience and security of telecom networks in Europe, > notably through a ?de-risking approach? to subsea cables. > > In addition, the Commission plans to release a recommendation regarding > subsea cables soon. These initiatives set the scene for conversations on > the future of telecom networks in the context of upcoming EU elections and > will influence the agenda-setting process for the next mandate. > > All the best > Romain > _____ > > Romain Bosc > Sr. Public Policy & Governance Officer > RIPE NCC > E: rbosc(a)ripe.net > T: +32 498 59 41 68 > >

1 0