On Consensus and Humming in the IETF
I have been sharing this Internet draft by Pete Resnick with various people and getting very positive feed-back which has encouraged me to share more widely: Title : On Consensus and Humming in the IETF Author(s) : Pete Resnick Filename : draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt Pages : 15 Date : 2013-10-04 http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i-d-announce/current/msg53974.html The text is available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-resnick-on-consensus-05 It is a useful read for anyone who is looking for consensus in our kind of environment. Regards, Gordon @ Vancouver
One thing to keep in mind: This document does not yet have IETF consensus. In fact, opinions I've heard are pretty varied. --Richard On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Gordon Lennox <gordon.lennox.13@gmail.com>wrote:
I have been sharing this Internet draft by Pete Resnick with various people and getting very positive feed-back which has encouraged me to share more widely:
Title : On Consensus and Humming in the IETF Author(s) : Pete Resnick Filename : draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt Pages : 15 Date : 2013-10-04
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i-d-announce/current/msg53974.html
The text is available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-resnick-on-consensus-05
It is a useful read for anyone who is looking for consensus in our kind of environment.
Regards,
Gordon @ Vancouver
On 06/11/2013 17:03, Richard Barnes wrote:
One thing to keep in mind: This document does not yet have IETF consensus. In fact, opinions I've heard are pretty varied.
yes, have they been adequately addressed by the author? -n
On 6 Nov 2013, at 17:04, Nick Hilliard <nick@inex.ie> wrote:
On 06/11/2013 17:03, Richard Barnes wrote:
One thing to keep in mind: This document does not yet have IETF consensus. In fact, opinions I've heard are pretty varied.
yes, have they been adequately addressed by the author?
I'm not sure if there's consensus on that. :-)
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> wrote:
On 6 Nov 2013, at 17:04, Nick Hilliard <nick@inex.ie> wrote:
On 06/11/2013 17:03, Richard Barnes wrote:
One thing to keep in mind: This document does not yet have IETF consensus. In fact, opinions I've heard are pretty varied.
yes, have they been adequately addressed by the author?
I'm not sure if there's consensus on that. :-)
Before this gets too meta... the document has passed IETF last call, and I believe is currently in the process of resolving comments. --Richard
Hi, On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 07:01:32PM +0000, Jim Reid wrote:
On 6 Nov 2013, at 17:04, Nick Hilliard <nick@inex.ie> wrote:
On 06/11/2013 17:03, Richard Barnes wrote:
One thing to keep in mind: This document does not yet have IETF consensus. In fact, opinions I've heard are pretty varied.
yes, have they been adequately addressed by the author? I'm not sure if there's consensus on that. :-)
We'll go along with it anyway! Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
participants (5)
-
Gert Doering -
Gordon Lennox -
Jim Reid -
Nick Hilliard -
Richard Barnes