Dear TF members, I've produced two initial documents ahead of the first call. Sorry, this is a little later than I'd hoped. 1. The first is a summary of community feedback since the current draft v3.0 was published: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Q5FTTb5wTwV0zt1KUJgtloygmMUo9FNeJ_m9z1Tv... Here, I went through the archives and looked for comments that seemed relevant. I pasted over what I felt were the key points, and did some edits to keep the wordcount down (links to the full comments are included to the right). In some cases, I split one email into several entries in the table - this should be clear, as I've merged the refence columns in these cases. I also tried to categorise the feedback slightly. I'll give this another review next week to make sure I haven't missed anything. If there's time, I'll also look for feedback on the earlier drafts that still has relevence. Unfortunately, I don't know if the TF will find too much direction in terms of changes to the existing text here. This might be a good thing - it does seem there is more support for the general idea of a CoC than when the Diversity TF first started with this. 2. The second document has a couple of initial thoughts/suggestions on the initial CoC document from our side: https://docs.google.com/document/d/11G9S2FRSU9RWM5QPlUyS6TJzL2vT1sWBt3fgGebL... Finally, I assume that the goal is not to throw out the current draft, which is clear and well written. However, from experience it's sometimes helpful to start with a blank page, as the existing text and structure can steer your thinking in subtle ways. This might be something to consider, even if the aim is to produce something very similar to the current draft. While counter-intuitive, this is often the faster approach as well. Happy to follow the TF's lead here in any case. Cheers Ant