Hi, I took a guess at how much time each topic would need. I'm happy to adjust based on feedback both from the TF and the person we get to chair the session. Kind regards, Leo On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 8:09 AM Brian Nisbet <brian.nisbet@heanet.ie> wrote:
Leo,
Ok, cool. 10 minutes might be a little much for my section in that case and Athina may need more, but happy with that plan.
Brian
Brian Nisbet (he/him)
Service Operations Manager
HEAnet CLG, Ireland's National Education and Research Network
1st Floor, 5 George's Dock, IFSC, Dublin D01 X8N7, Ireland
+35316609040 brian.nisbet@heanet.ie www.heanet.ie
Registered in Ireland, No. 275301. CRA No. 20036270
________________________________ From: Leo Vegoda <leo@vegoda.org> Sent: Monday 26 July 2021 13:25 To: Brian Nisbet <brian.nisbet@heanet.ie> Cc: coc-tf@ripe.net <coc-tf@ripe.net>; chair-team@ripe.net <chair-team@ripe.net> Subject: Re: [coc-tf] Status update and discussion on webinar format
CAUTION[External]: This email originated from outside of the organisation. Do not click on links or open the attachments unless you recognise the sender and know the content is safe.
Hi Brian,
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 1:28 AM Brian Nisbet <brian.nisbet@heanet.ie> wrote:
Leo,
Just to check, do you foresee each section having its own Q&A?
No. My goal is to have the chair we invite ask insightful questions up front, to answer 80% of what the audience wants to know. But I left a section of time at the end for any questions not already asked and answered. I hope that this approach will allow us to dedicate time to each of the key changes and not overrun.
I'm perfectly happy talking about that section and I don't have any issues with the order. Chair wise, both of the suggestions are great, and I'm sure there are other similarly great community members, but my gut says that variety of chair would be good.
I agree that variety would be helpful.
Kind regards,
Leo