Hi, On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 3:54 AM Niall O'Reilly <niall.oreilly@ucd.ie> wrote:
On 16 Feb 2022, at 22:39, Leo Vegoda wrote:
- When an incident takes place at an event, the Code of Conduct Team CANNOT suggest excluding the subject of the report from participating in the RIPE community after the conclusion of the event.[0] - When an incident takes place over the Internet, the Code of Conduct Team CANNOT suggest excluding the subject of the report from participating in the RIPE community for more than one month.
Leo, I’m sorry for the delay in following up on the discussion Mirjam and I had with you on Wednesday. We’ve had an extended holiday weekend here in Ireland.
I think it’s appropriate not to constrain what the Code-of-Conduct Team may SUGGEST, but rather to limit the severity of sanctions which are to be applied without confirmation by a higher authority.
I hope this helps, and isn’t too terse or abstract.
This is helpful. At last week's meeting we made progress on the process document. The approach now is that the CoC Team will inform the RIPE Chair and RIPE NCC of a decision before it's implemented. We also agreed to publish a blog post with some specific questions in it, so the community is informed about the choices being made. I have drafted a blog post, which is with the RIPE Labs team. It has a section on specific questions: " We would like your thoughts on the authority to delegate to the Code of Conduct Team. " How much responsibility should we delegate to the Code of Conduct Team? Do you want a threshold beyond which their decisions become advisory? " The RIPE NCC will always ensure the record keeping system meets all legal requirements. But do you want it to be able to track a pattern of behaviour that generates multiple reports?" I am hoping we'll be able to publish the draft and blog post at the start of April. Kind regards, Leo