Re: [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Yes it is. About the sixth offlist reply I've got from you. And yes this is a top post. Is all the "internet policing" this group is capable of solely restricted to attempted enforcement of usenet era message conventions? --srs ________________________________ From: Bengt Gördén <bengan@resilans.se> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2019 5:51 PM To: Suresh Ramasubramanian Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox") top post -- Bengt Gördén Resilans AB
In message <SL2PR03MB452442B289F19EBE688E6749F50B0@SL2PR03MB4524.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com>, Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
Is all the "internet policing" this group is capable of solely restricted to attempted enforcement of usenet era message conventions?
Top posting is yet another a sinister and nefarious plot on the part of Microsoft to utterly destroy everything, including even email conversation. I am strongly in favor of of having all top posters everywhere surgically separated from their genitalia. Nontheless, I concur with Suresh's sentiments. Of the top ten Bad Things happening on the Internet, right now, as we speak, that absolutely demand the urgent attention of serious people, this isn't one of them. Regards, rfg
participants (2)
-
Ronald F. Guilmette -
Suresh Ramasubramanian