Abuse contact of 85.95.235.0 - 85.95.235.255 not working (emails bounce)
Abuse email contact of 85.95.235.0 - 85.95.235.255 not working (emails bounce): The abuse contact email address of the the following RIPE member isn't functioning for more than 3 weeks now as all mails to that address bounce: " SMAIL SMTP-Send MX = "mail.atalaybilisim.com." SMTP = "mutluit.com" From = "security@mutluit.com" To = "dns@atalaybilisim.com" Failed ! SMTP-Error = "550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable or not local" SMTP-Server = "mail.atalaybilisim.com." " Additionally, they have given their IP 85.95.235.101 the DNS hostname "localhost.mail.localdomain" . The same with their second IP 85.95.235.102. Is this legal? Isn't that an indication for a "mail server hacker collective"? The above said two IPs are among the bounced abuse reports. ############# # nslookup 85.95.235.101 Non-authoritative answer: 101.235.95.85.in-addr.arpa name = localhost.mail.localdomain. ############# # nslookup 85.95.235.102 Non-authoritative answer: 102.235.95.85.in-addr.arpa name = localhost.mail.localdomain. ############# # whois 85.95.235.101 % This is the RIPE Database query service. % The objects are in RPSL format. % % The RIPE Database is subject to Terms and Conditions. % See http://www.ripe.net/db/support/db-terms-conditions.pdf % Note: this output has been filtered. % To receive output for a database update, use the "-B" flag. % Information related to '85.95.235.0 - 85.95.235.255' inetnum: 85.95.235.0 - 85.95.235.255 netname: INETMAR descr: Turkhosting-Colocation Network remarks: ********************************************* remarks: *** Abuse Reports to: dns@atalaybilisim.com *** remarks: *** This IP block is used for web hosting,*** remarks: *** dedicated and co-located servers. In *** remarks: *** case of spam, please only deal with *** remarks: *** originator IP only. *** remarks: *** DO NOT DEAL WITH THE WHOLE IP BLOCK *** remarks: ********************************************* country: TR admin-c: OA1064-RIPE tech-c: OA1064-RIPE status: ASSIGNED PA mnt-by: TURKHOSTING-MNT source: RIPE # Filtered person: Oguz Atalay address: 189 CADDE 270 SOKAK NO: 2/A phone: +903123187847 fax-no: +903123187848 nic-hdl: OA1064-RIPE source: RIPE # Filtered % Information related to '85.95.235.0/24AS49467' route: 85.95.235.0/24 descr: INETMAR-IZMIR origin: AS49467 mnt-by: INETMAR-MNT source: RIPE # Filtered % This query was served by the RIPE Database Query Service version 1.19.9 (WHOIS4) #############
2012-10-03 12:21, U.Mutlu skrev:
Abuse email contact of 85.95.235.0 - 85.95.235.255 not working (emails bounce):
The abuse contact email address of the the following RIPE member isn't functioning for more than 3 weeks now as all mails to that address bounce: " SMAIL SMTP-Send MX = "mail.atalaybilisim.com." SMTP = "mutluit.com" From = "security@mutluit.com" To = "dns@atalaybilisim.com" Failed ! SMTP-Error = "550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable or not local" SMTP-Server = "mail.atalaybilisim.com." "
Additionally, they have given their IP 85.95.235.101 the DNS hostname "localhost.mail.localdomain" . The same with their second IP 85.95.235.102.
Is this legal? Isn't that an indication for a "mail server hacker collective"?
The above said two IPs are among the bounced abuse reports.
To be unreachable by email isn't illegal. However, according to RIPE-530 it has to be correct at all times. http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-530#----registration-requirements /bengan
On Wednesday 03 October 2012 12.21, U.Mutlu wrote:
Abuse email contact of 85.95.235.0 - 85.95.235.255 not working (emails bounce):
You man block route: 85.95.224.0/21 descr: INETMAR-izmir they belongs to the same spammer. -- Peter Håkanson There's never money to do it right, but always money to do it again ... and again ... and again ... and again. ( Det är billigare att göra rätt. Det är dyrt att laga fel. )
participants (3)
-
Bengt Gördén
-
peter h
-
U.Mutlu