Re: [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 20, Issue 7

On 28.04.2013 12:00, wrote anti-abuse-wg-request@ripe.net:
What provider is this ? Why do you hide their name ?
May it be that the name of this provider begins with H and spamcop is routing all abuse reports for this provider to /dev/null because this provider only does forwarding (also to spammers) and nothing else? Best regards, - Karl-Josef

Karl-Josef Ziegler wrote:
On 28.04.2013 12:00, wrote anti-abuse-wg-request@ripe.net:
What provider is this ? Why do you hide their name ?
May it be that the name of this provider begins with H and spamcop is routing all abuse reports for this provider to /dev/null because this provider only does forwarding (also to spammers) and nothing else?
Good guess, your right with both. I used to lots of ISPs ignoring reports completely, some do really take care and fix holes pretty perfect and quick. But having an abuse address, policy and doing like, if they are good guys and then leaving it to the uneducated end user is really hypocritically and insincere, so I was pretty puzzled with this one ... Anyway, I dont want to talk bad about others, more interested in getting feedback, what will happen after everybody HAS an abuse address. Kind regards, Frank
Best regards,
- Karl-Josef
participants (2)
-
Frank Gadegast
-
Karl-Josef Ziegler