Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Who owns 24.205.98.101?
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/b5a656ea2ea262f9a97ddf6afb1f6943.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hello Peter, The Whois information clearly shows this IP to be part of Charter Communications network: NetRange: 24.205.76.0 - 24.205.99.255 CIDR: 24.205.96.0/22, 24.205.80.0/20, 24.205.76.0/22 OriginAS: NetName: CHAR-PAS-205-76-99 NetHandle: NET-24-205-76-0-1 Parent: NET-24-205-0-0-1 NetType: Reallocated RegDate: 2001-09-30 Updated: 2003-08-27 Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-24-205-76-0-1 OrgName: Charter Communications OrgId: CC04 Address: 12405 Powerscourt Dr. City: St. Louis StateProv: MO PostalCode: 63131 Country: US RegDate: Updated: 2012-07-03 Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/org/CC04 OrgTechHandle: IPADD1-ARIN OrgTechName: IPAddressing OrgTechPhone: +1-314-288-3889 OrgTechEmail: ipaddressing@chartercom.com OrgTechRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/IPADD1-ARIN OrgAbuseHandle: ABUSE19-ARIN OrgAbuseName: Abuse OrgAbusePhone: +1-314-288-3111 OrgAbuseEmail: abuse@charter.net OrgAbuseRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/ABUSE19-ARIN OrgNOCHandle: NNOC16-ARIN OrgNOCName: National Network Operations Center OrgNOCPhone: +1-314-288-3111 OrgNOCEmail: dlnocip@chartercom.com OrgNOCRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/NNOC16-ARIN ++++ So, I do not understand why they are telling you otherwise. I have copied the responsible parties at Charter Communication so that they could investigate this matter further. Thank you, Reza Farzan ****************** -----Original Message-----
From: peter h <peter@hk.ipsec.se> Sent: Jun 25, 2013 9:37 AM To: anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Who owns 24.205.98.101?
On Tuesday 25 June 2013 09.18, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Hi,
Whois seems to say it's Charter Communications, abuse@charter.net. But if I mail them, they say:
This email address is for reporting incidents of abuse coming from IP addresses registered to Charter Communications. Abuse from IP addresses not registered to Charter Communications should be directed to the registered owners of the IP address in question.
If the abuse "function" don't work i suggest that blocking this range will work.
If and when charter decides that their customers should have full access they should start with a working abuse staff ( and some more ) Until then, we can manage without them.
<snip> # # #
From: Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek@gmail.com> To: abuse@charter.net Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:11:38 +0200 Subject: DDoS Attack from 24.205.98.101
-- Peter Håkanson
There's never money to do it right, but always money to do it again ... and again ... and again ... and again. ( Det är billigare att göra rätt. Det är dyrt att laga fel. )
participants (1)
-
Reza Farzan