Re: [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 9:25 AM Jeffrey Race <jrace@post.harvard.edu> wrote:
e-mail must be allowed because most victims are not organizations but individual net users
E-mail does not scale well. It was great in the 1990s, when the Internet was smaller and people knew each other. About half the world's population now has some sort of Internet connectivity. Expecting organizations to be able to understand reports from such a diverse group of people is unreasonable. Lots of organizations won't have specialized abuse handling teams. If they don't have a specialized abuse handling team then they are unlikely to have people who understand the reports or processes for acting on them. Forcing these organizations to pretend that they will read and understand and then act on a report will never make it so. So let's stop pretending and put energy into something more productive than asking people to set up an autoresponder for an e-mail address whose mailbox will never be checked by a human.
In message <CAPfiqjZkxVw7zJaSXb5mtg9_oB8nhXeU-_4rH+_tCWp3pv0=7g@mail.gmail.com> Leo Vegoda <leo@vegoda.org> wrote:
E-mail does not scale well. It was great in the 1990s, when the Internet was smaller and people knew each other. About half the world's population now has some sort of Internet connectivity. Expecting organizations to be able to understand reports from such a diverse group of people is unreasonable.
You're right. Email is shit. However as long as network operators allow their errant end-lusers to spam me via email, I expect them to also accept reports about that via email. If they don't want to, then fine. They can just block outbound port 25 for their entire networks at and in the routers. Problem solved and everybody's happy. Regards, rfg
participants (2)
-
Leo Vegoda
-
Ronald F. Guilmette