On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 03:50:56 -0700 "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@tristatelogic.com> wrote:

ox <andre@ox.co.za> wrote:

...

When anyone commits fraud to obtain a resource from RIPE, RIPE has the responsibility to file criminal charges against that criminal.

I am not saying that I think RIPE should file criminal charges...

I would suggest that you consider running for President of the United States, but we've already got another guy in the race who routinely manages to contradict himself within the space of two consecutive sentences.

I am not sure why you would do what you are doing, but you "conveniently" remove the following sentences from the same post: "I am saying that not doing so is in itself a questionable action." So, to be clear - I am not saying that I THINK ripe should file criminal charges (THEY MUST) I am also saying NOT doing that is a questionable action. Nit picking much Ron? Why do you not contribute to the post and rather ask for an explanation than telling me that I am contradicting myself when clearly you did not read what I typed? Andre