Hello,

Changes in version 2.0 include:

- Overall rewording - Description of the use of "abuse-c:" and "abuse-mailbox:" on differing RIPE Database objects - Removal of references to a transition period

What I still miss is a clear positioning of the IRT object vs. abuse-c. While these may not overlap completely, they certainly would to a large extend for a lot of CERTs, thus creating redundant data. So I'd join Leo on his comments that the use of the object should be clearer before creating it. If not the worst case might be that we end up with another randomly used object. Best, Gilles -- Fondation RESTENA - DNS-LU 6, rue Coudenhove-Kalergi L-1359 Luxembourg tel: (+352) 424409 fax: (+352) 422473