Colleagues After publishing a second version of the policy proposal I have started a new conversation on the DB WG mailing list about resource holders addresses. As this is a topic of interest to this Anti Abuse community please feel free to contribute to the new discussion here https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/2022-June/007460.html <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/2022-June/007458.html> As it is a Database policy it would be good if we can keep the discussion in one place on the DB WG mailing list. cheers denis policy proposer
I got the link wrong in the previous email https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/2022-June/007460.html Cheers denis On Thu, 16 Jun 2022, 17:13 denis walker, <ripedenis@gmail.com> wrote:
Colleagues
After publishing a second version of the policy proposal I have started a new conversation on the DB WG mailing list about resource holders addresses. As this is a topic of interest to this Anti Abuse community please feel free to contribute to the new discussion here https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/2022-June/007460.html <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/2022-June/007458.html>
As it is a Database policy it would be good if we can keep the discussion in one place on the DB WG mailing list.
cheers denis policy proposer
participants (1)
-
denis walker