Re: [anti-abuse-wg] AS24940 Hetzner -- non-role contact wanted
ac <ac@main.me> you wrote:
rfg wrote:
And by the way, one can't help wondering what makes you so eager to defend spammers AND those who sell them services. You aren't by any chance in the bulk emailing business, or in the bulk emailing support business yourself, are you? Sorry, but under the circumstances I think it is altogether reasonable to ask. Regards, rfg
wow. you are even a more sucky person than I thought... and now everyone knows what and whom you are.
A simple yes or no would do. I'll repeat the question. Are you yourself in the bulk emailing business, or do you provide support services to those who are? It's a fairly simple question. Are you reluctant to provide a clear answer? If you're going to be giving advice to people for how they should or should not be attempting to get spammers removed from the Internet, then maybe you should first reveal whether or not you personally have any vested personal interest in the matter which might possibly color your opinions on this specific topic. Regards, rfg
On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 23:06:44 -0700 "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@tristatelogic.com> wrote:
ac <ac@main.me> you wrote:
rfg wrote:
defend spammers AND those who sell them services. You aren't by any chance in the bulk emailing business, or in the bulk emailing support business yourself, are you? Sorry, but under the circumstances I think it is altogether reasonable to ask. everyone knows what and whom you are. A simple yes or no would do.
so we are no longer talking about my underwear?
I'll repeat the question. Are you yourself in the bulk emailing business, or do you provide support services to those who are?
When American spammers, who are actually TRANSMITTING the email spam (and not providing network routing) abuses the Internet (and the planet) by growing their businesses, this is perfectly fine, as this does not fit your "agenda" UBE (which is an archaic concept, btw) providers are dead easy to block or drop
It's a fairly simple question. Are you reluctant to provide a clear answer?
Okay, clear and direct answers about myself: I do not like underwear much :) And, No, I do not work for any one of the American Spammers and spam transmitters (Google, Amazon, Twitter, Facebook, Micorosft, etc) I also do not transmit, empower or relay any unsolicited bulk email.
If you're going to be giving advice to people for how they should or should not be attempting to get spammers removed from the Internet, then maybe you should first reveal whether or not you personally have any vested personal interest in the matter which might possibly color your opinions on this specific topic.
I am not providing any advice except for stating that you are either ignorant or technically incompetent. Maybe you can answer a simple question and tell me which one it is? Are you Ignorant or technically incompetent? Andre
participants (2)
-
ac -
Ronald F. Guilmette