5 Nov
2014
5 Nov
'14
11:23 a.m.
On Wed, November 5, 2014 11:14, Sascha Luck wrote:
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 11:06:34AM +0100, furio ercolessi wrote:
several times!), then new information could be supplied in the whois after asking for consent from the resource holder, no ?
Anyone believing that those parties which can expect to become the target of Ronald-Style investigations would consent and supply the info? This is barking up the wrong tree (again). Wilfried
Which will not be forthcoming from *this* resource holder.
So perhaps we can take this opportunity to discuss an extension of the data shown in the public whois.
Not while this member pays membership fees.
rgds, Sascha Luck