-----Original Message----- From: anti-abuse-wg-bounces@ripe.net [mailto:anti-abuse-wg- bounces@ripe.net] On Behalf Of lists@help.org Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 8:01 PM To: <anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net>
On 8/15/2012 11:55 AM, Luis Muñoz wrote:
In my experience, lists managed through those principles tend to fall out of use relatively quickly and are therefore rather inconsequential for mail delivery.
That is not my experience. For instance, you can readily find complaints about Microsoft and Cisco as well as some of the contributors to this list.
One can probably 'find complaints' about whichever matter in existence. Highly useful and widely used DNSBLs tend to draw particularly large amounts of irate complaints from people whose resources have been listed. The bottom line is that mail server administrators use such DNSBLs as have proven to be valuable. If a list causes excessive false positives, e.g. due to bad management, dropping it is a simple matter of adding a comment delimiter to a configuration file.
people heavily involved in abuse are often out of touch with the rest of the world
Thank you for your incessant efforts in pointing this out. -- Thor Kottelin http://www.anta.net/