Brian Nisbet wrote: Hello, I still like to have mentoined that "Phase one: Implementing the policy" will include a new whois switch beeing introduced, that will return the abuse-c's abuse-mailbox attribute for a given IPv4/IPv6 addresses straight away and fall back to a result from the abuse finder tool, if there is no abuse-c for this address yet. The access to this whois query needs to be unrestricted. If the community thinks, that this should happen later, Im also ok with it. So: simply a +1 from me. Kind regards, Frank
Colleagues,
Two weeks ago Emilio published the revised version of 2011-06 and the RIPE NCC Impact Analysis. I was hoping that this would answer some of the questions that were raised in the discussion phase and prompt further discussion of the proposal, but this hasn't happened.
Could I ask the WG to take a look at the links:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2011-06
and the draft document at:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2011-06/draft
and see if there are remaining questions or things you would like to discuss so we can gauge reaction to 2011-06?
Thanks,
Brian.
-- Mit freundlichen Gruessen, -- MOTD: "have you enabled SSL on a website or mailbox today ?" -- PHADE Software - PowerWeb http://www.powerweb.de Inh. Dipl.-Inform. Frank Gadegast mailto:frank@powerweb.de Schinkelstrasse 17 fon: +49 33200 52920 14558 Nuthetal OT Rehbruecke, Germany fax: +49 33200 52921 ======================================================================