Ah that way. Then -
Do we have rough consensus? If not at what point is it reached?
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 1:07 PM
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian
Cc: Sascha Luck [ml]; Brian Nisbet; Ricardo Patara; anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 08:36:01AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> In my opinion we are long past the stage of rough consensus on this list. Take it to the WG and see if it gets consensus there and please spare the rest of the list some very pointless discussion.
Uh. "This list" is "the WG" - RIPE working group consensus building happens
on the lists, because otherwise only people with deep enough pockets to
attend RIPE meetings can participate in policy making.
The WG meetings are good for face-to-face discussions with quicker turnaround
times and possibly easier to sort out language misunderstandings - but at
least for APWG, only statements on the list are considered relevant wrt
RIPE policy making.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279