Morning,

If you have specific disagreements with the Co-Chairs, then please contact us at aa-wg-chair@ripe.net with the your reasoning for 2019-04 has reached consensus.

The appeals procedure beyond that is detailed in RIPE 710 and I have copied & pasted the specific paragraph here:

"If a grievance cannot be resolved with the chair of the WG the matter can be brought to the attention of the Working Group Chairs Collective (WGCC). Anyone may submit an appeal. This must be submitted to the relevant WG mailing list(s) and to the Policy Announce Mailing List (policy-announce@ripe.net). The appeal will also be published by the RIPE NCC at appropriate locations on the RIPE web site. Any appeal should include a detailed and specific description of the issues and clearly explain why the appeal was submitted. An appeal must be submitted no later than four weeks after the appealable action has occurred.

The WGCC will decide by consensus whether to uphold or reject appeals which have been submitted. The decision of the WGCC should be reached no later than four weeks of an appeal being made. Interested parties shall recuse themselves from any discussion or decision within the WGCC relating to the appeal.

If the dispute cannot be resolved by the decision of the WGCC, the issue should be brought to the RIPE Chair. The decision of the RIPE Chair will be final."

The WGCC can be contacted at wg-chairs@ripe.net

However the first step is to contact the WG Chairs for AA-WG with an argument against our decision.

Thanks,

Brian
Co-Chair, RIPE AA-WG

Brian Nisbet 

Service Operations Manager

HEAnet CLG, Ireland's National Education and Research Network

1st Floor, 5 George's Dock, IFSC, Dublin D01 X8N7, Ireland

+35316609040 brian.nisbet@heanet.ie www.heanet.ie

Registered in Ireland, No. 275301. CRA No. 20036270 

From: anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of JJS JJS <no0484985@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday 9 September 2020 02:37
To: anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net <anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net>
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
 

CAUTION[External]: This email originated from outside of the organisation. Do not click on links or open the attachments unless you recognise the sender and know the content is safe.

I disagree that it did not reach consensus. There was never any proper measure of whether it reached consensus.

---



On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 1:48 AM Petrit Hasani <phasani@ripe.net> wrote:
Dear colleagues,

The policy proposal 2019-04, "Validation of "abuse-mailbox”” has been withdrawn.

The proposal aimed to have the RIPE NCC validate "abuse-c:” information more often and introduce a new validation process.

The proposal is archived and can be found at:
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/archived-policy-proposals/archive-policy-proposals/

Reason for withdrawal:
The proposal did not reach consensus and the WG chairs did not feel that any further redrafting of the proposal would achieve consensus.

Kind regards,
--
Petrit Hasani
Policy Officer
RIPE NCC