Re: [anti-abuse-wg] LIR membership

Shane Kerr wrote: [...]

I don't represent an LIR, so it feels a bit weird to recommend changes to the process. If it is too easy, some things can be done. Perhaps some sort of process where you need to be introduced by another LIR before you can join? It would be a low hurdle, but it might be something.

This would definitely raise some eyebrows, as has been said already. Moreover, I'd expect serious procedural problems for some regions and/or types of applicants.

-- Shane

I think this approach is neither useful nor feasible - and it wouldn't achieve the goal, on top of it ;-) Wilfried.