That is the most stupid thing i've read on this list.
 
What little protection the world has from spammers and all manner of criminals, and you still think it's too much that they even so much as have to check their email account.
 
Which criminal is paying you to say this nonsense, because no ordinary person that has ever received a spam email would ever say such crap.
 
and if there can be no "internet police", i'm sure RIPE will have no problem if someone never pays a fee to it ever again, because it doesn't have the mandate to suspend a resource for crime, it cannot do it for non payment.
 
or is non-payment more serious than a DDoS attack?
 
 
 
--------- Original Message ---------
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
From: "Gert Doering" <gert@space.net>
Date: 1/14/20 9:19 pm
To: "JORDI PALET MARTINEZ" <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
Cc: "anti-abuse-wg" <anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net>

Hi,

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 10:50:58AM +0100, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via anti-abuse-wg wrote:
> Looks fine to me.
>
> If we really think that the operators should be free from taking abuse reports, then let's make it optional.
>
> As said, I personally think that an operator responsibility is to deal with abuse cases, but happy to follow what we all decide.

I do think that an operator should handle abuse reports (and we do),
but *this* is not a suitable vehicle to *make him*.

And if it's not going to have the desired effect, do not waste time on it.

Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279