He seems to have an entirely different issue - of some netblocks being obtained with entirely faked whois records. Like, the physical address for a netblock is an empty lot between two garages, etc. While the abuse contact wg would be good to develop a standard format for noting an abuse contact in RIPE whois, it is hardly the place to deal with netblocks registered with fake contact information, and quite possibly registered with faked justification paperwork. RIPE's existing policies *should* cover this - but there's a notable lack of a formalzed resolution process on the lines of wdprs for domains. thanks suresh On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Kostas Zorbadelos <kzorba@otenet.gr> wrote:
Now, if I understand correctly from your posts, because most of the stuff written is incomprehensible to me, you seem to pose an issue about abuse contacts and validity of contact data in RIPE DB. There is a task force [1] that was created for this reason and we all expect information about its progress and outcome.
-- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists@gmail.com)