Thanks for your quick feedback, Michele. On 21/1/16 12:05, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote:
Brian
Thanks for sharing this
A couple of notes:
- there seems to be an assumption that “quality” and “responsiveness” are somehow linked.
That wasn't the intention. We will clarify this in the text.
- the flow for ccTLD domain lookups seems to jump from the IANA DB directly to the CERT, which seems like overkill. The whois data *might* provide contact information that would be useful or failing that the hostname lookup would give the hosting provider / ISP. (or maybe I’ve misread the chart?)
This was just meant a one example of how the process could go from query to data sets to result. We will try to clarify this in the chart itself or add some explanatory text. Regards, Mirjam
Regards
Michele
-- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains http://www.blacknight.host/ http://blog.blacknight.com/ http://ceo.hosting/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845
On 20/01/2016, 16:22, "anti-abuse-wg on behalf of Brian Nisbet" <anti-abuse-wg-bounces@ripe.net on behalf of brian.nisbet@heanet.ie> wrote:
Colleagues,
The group working on this document (L. Aaron Kaplan, Mirjam Kühne, Christian Teuschel) have produced a new draft. This draft contains a number of updates, based on feedback from the community.
The main changes are:
- clarified terminology such as abuse handler, security incident, registrant, national CERT, etc. - clarified problem statement - removed specific mentioning of name-based services in the problem statement - used "European" examples - added API details for Nation CSIRT DB - elaborated on conclusion and next steps
This document was sent to me earlier in the week, but for various reasons I didn't manage to forward it on to you all until now. With the TF-CSIRT meeting happening next week it would be great if we could gather any further feedback before the end of this week, but I realise that is quite a short term period, for which I apologise. So I'm not proposing a hard cut-off by end of day on Friday, but I think it would be extremely useful if people could try to post to the list before then.
This would hopefully allow the authors to go to the TF-CSIRT meeting with a very nearly final draft and then complete it shortly afterwards.
Certainly I would propose no more than a working week to receive other feedback, so we'd be looking at the end of Wednesday 27th.
Thanks,
Brian Co-Chair, RIPE AA-WG