In message <201301191728.56389.peter@hk.ipsec.se>, peter h <peter@hk.ipsec.se> wrote:
To be listed as spammer may in itself not be a reason to revoke addresses. But it should be enough to start an investigation, for instance mail the address"owners" and ask for a comment. If they cannot be reached then revokation comes closer ....
Having investigated a number of these kinds of things over a period of time I'd just like to say that responses obtained via either e-mail or via snail-mail are entirely less than definitive when one is trying to determine the truth. A reply e-mail can say anything, can contain any sort of a made up story that the sender wishes to fabricate, and can easily be made to appear to come from pretty much any domain that the responding party has control over. Likewise, snail-mails may spin any desired legend, and can (and have) included utterly made-up letterheads and envelopes and such other things as may seem to support the overall deception. Usually however, there is a finite and small number of individuals behind this sort of thing, so that requiring contact, at some mutually convenient time, via telephone can most likely flush out the fraud most efficiently. If it is always the exact same voice on the other end of the line... even when one is speaking to a number of allegedly separate and independent companies, then, to paraphrase William Shakespeare, it should be altogether apparent that something is rotten in Romania. Regards, rfg