-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 I haven't been closely following the development of this policy so it's almost certain that I've missed something. At the start of the proposal it mentions "it is not clear in which of these role objects it should be preferred.", but it's not clear to me at by the end of the document why I should prefer an abuse-c attribute to an irt object. Also: "there will be some automated clean up of users data to reorganize abuse contact references where possible." Is that expanded on anywhere? James - -- James Davis 0300 999 2340 (+44 1235 822340) Senior CSIRT Member Lumen House, Library Avenue, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0SG -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAk7NHpYACgkQjsS2Y6D6yLyMeAD5AYzwqaIg3Oyefmik24B/K2P7 /aQy1GtpJeuqrCEQVF8BAOFl4c/f0qum4G4qp0OtgF8Ntv70owZxIwGuwlL5nBce =Xul4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- JANET(UK) is a trading name of The JNT Association, a company limited by guarantee which is registered in England under No. 2881024 and whose Registered Office is at Lumen House, Library Avenue, Harwell Oxford, Didcot, Oxfordshire. OX11 0SG