Re: [anti-abuse-wg] meeting minutes

clearly state the deficiencies you perceive instead of using terms like "cryptic" without substantiation.

It references issues brought up on the mailing list without listing those issues. Someone would have to read through all the e-mails to understand what the issues are and even then many people will have different perspectives of what the issues actually are. The issues need to be listed somewhere. Maybe they shouldn't be in the the minutes, maybe a summary of the issues posted somewhere and a link provided in the minutes. In any case the issues should be spelled out somewhere in a summary of what the task force is trying to do.