On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 11:09:24AM +0000, Carlos Friaças via anti-abuse-wg wrote:
Dear Carlos,
8. "So Legacy holders (resources with a legacy status) are for obvious reasons, excluded for penalties and out of reach. Also according to the policy that specifies services to Legacy holders, as this policy doesn't state that it wants to include and impact legacy holders." I don't agree. If you check i was one of the co-authors of 2012-07 :-) In my initial drafts for 2019-03, there was a line about legacy holders. It seems now clear it needs to be recovered for version 2.0 :-) Although I have mixed feelings about this policy and haven't made my mind yet, I wish you good luck with that one thing. As a large legacy holder, I do not want to be excluded or exempted from
On 22/03/2019 14:17, Piotr Strzyzewski wrote: this new policy, if accepted. I can understand that if the legacy holder has not filed any paperwork with the NCC, then there is little one could do t penalized the offender. That is where I think Jordi's comment about the direct peer also comes in. Just as today when confronted with a BGP hijack and no response from the hijacking ASN, one approaches the direct upstream, so too the policy will have to set a policy on how to deal with the direct upstream that enables the hijack, whether it be from a legacy or a regular holder. Regards, Hank
Piotr