3 Mar
2016
3 Mar
'16
11:40 a.m.
On 03/03/2016 11:32, Randy Bush wrote:
so the idea is we mandate that there be an abuse-c: so that there is an email address where we can send mail to which there will be no response?
you could just as easily make the same arguments about admin-c or tech-c.
no. being able to contact them is necessary for the ncc to maintain the registry.
It is not necessary to have either an admin-c or tech-c for the NCC to maintain the registry. The NCC has it's own internal details of how to contact resource holders. The admin-c and tech-c are a convenience for other network managers to contact each other. So even you are now confused over what is operationally useful and what is for registry accuracy. cheers denis
randy