So perhaps the first hurdle to change anything is understanding that RIPE/RIPE NCC <> EU, despite the fact the RIPE NCC must abide by the laws of ONE of EU's member countries. I fixed that for you: So perhaps the first hurdle to change anything is understanding that RIPE/RIPE NCC <> EU, despite the fact the RIPE NCC must abide by the laws of ONE of EU's member countries and therfore also ALL EU laws. -- IDGARA | Alex de Joode | alex@idgara.nl | +31651108221 Op ma, 20-06-2022 12u 48min, Carlos Friaças via anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net> schreef:
Hi,
The RIPE NCC Service Region spans over 70+ economies.
In fact it spans over the whole planet when someone from outside the service region details some plans to use IP addresses mostly within the service region -- is this verified some time after the resources are allocated?
So perhaps the first hurdle to change anything is understanding that RIPE/RIPE NCC <> EU, despite the fact the RIPE NCC must abide by the laws of ONE of EU's member countries.
Regards, Carlos
On Sun, 19 Jun 2022, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
Just a brief point. I previously noted here that RIPE's rules requiring unanimity or near unanimity in order to declare "consensus" with respect to any given proposal has recently been recognized, by some EU politicians at least, as being a material impediment to forward movement on various issues.
I only just noted that this growing sentiment has now apparently extended even to the Chancellor of Germany:
https://twitter.com/EuromaidanPress/status/1538637496124317704
My hope, of course, is that RIPE and its various WGs are taking notes.
Regards, rfg
--
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/anti-abuse-wg
--
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/anti-abuse-wg