On 2017-09-25 18:33, Malcolm Hutty wrote:
Yes, I get that it will trigger on that.
What I'm struggling with (I don't want to speak for Nick), is this: what is the benefit of getting people to set it to a valid address that no human reads, or no human capable of acting, over null or the various null-equivalents you list?
Who does that help? How?
I want to second this question in light of the proposal from Malcolm on 2017-09-25 16:02 CEST to enact a different form of monitoring by the NCC, namely "a simple visualisation tool for the BGP routing table." It would be interesting to hear what are the pros and cons of this proposal, and opinions of the group with respect to the efficacy of such a measure given Europol's likely priorities. best regards, Amelia