![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/daa9ea618351eb68baad89b6dfab4f28.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
In message <CALZ3u+Z4CVN0zj41kD69VEscYu=GVN=d-y=1ZjmuAJp0V8KJnw@mail.gmail.com> =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=B6ma_Gavrichenkov?= <ximaera@gmail.com> wrote:
And yes, Kazakhstanian court also thinks IP addresses are property. Do you consider yourself in a good company now?
I am not in a position to argue with the opinions of either Kazakhstan coyrts or U.S. courts.
IP addresses are a public shared resource. They are a *policy*, not a property.
OK. If you say so. All I can say is that I realized, some years ago now, how little it matters what we call things. For years I have tried to persuade all of my friends and family to call my Honda automobile a Ferrari. And some have obliged me. I have noticed however that despite this, the car's general attributes and its performance characteristics have not changed one wit. Regards, rfg