![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/fcc7b58a306a02e8bbed2a2a08c64909.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hi, On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 05:59:29PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
1. As a post mortem
So how much effort do we want to make (read: should the LIRs pay) on a dead horse?
2. To possibly stop those same entities from acquiring v6 blocks?
If these entities are legitimate businesses according to their national law, if the RIPE NCC will *not* give them addresses, we're going to have large problems (anti-monopoly laws, etc.). The situation is quite clear if a LEA shows up and states "these are criminals", and the RIPE policy takes that into account (withdraw addresses). Now, how do you know upfront that a new business is criminal, as defined by applicable law? "Is run by a well-known spammer" might be clear to you and me, but is it clear enough from a *legal* perspective? Gert Doering -- did you enable IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279