On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 05:01:52PM +0200, Denis Walker wrote: Dear Denis
At RIPE 67 in Athens, the RIPE NCC agreed to take another look at the implementation of RIPE Document ripe-563, "Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE Database."
Two issues have been identified that are seen to be difficult to handle with the current model - partitioned subnets within one organisation and adding abuse contacts to more specifics for End Users. The RIPE NCC has considered these two issues and found what we believe to be practical solutions, available within the current model.
More information about these solutions and the implementation of "abuse-c:" is available on RIPE Labs: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/denis/suggestions-for-improving-abuse-handling
This topic will also be raised during the Anti-Abuse Working Group session at RIPE 68 in Warsaw.
First of all thanks for the proposed solution. I would like to comment both issues: 1. A solution to the subnet issue I perceive this proposed solution as a way of making a lot of mess whenever some customer marked with additional abuse-c leaves LIR. 2. A solution to the End User issue I like this idea. However I'm not sure why at the third screen there is RIPE-NCC-MNT mentioned, contrary to the LIR-MNT put on the fourth screen. Piotr -- gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski@polsl.pl