In message <CALZ3u+bpTu+R63s_O_Fqr-Qz3DaFh1e9N+7dD1WbzSn028cDHA@mail.gmail.com> =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=B6ma_Gavrichenkov?= <ximaera@gmail.com> wrote:
2. OTOH the ultimate result (membership cancellation) may be seen as a very heavy punishment.
Did you have some particular alternative in mind that you wanted to propose? Sending the miscreant hijacker to bed without supper perhaps?
- hire a script kiddie who will break into that company's Mikrotik; - announce roughly half of IPv4 address space through that breach just for it to be surely on the news; - relax and enjoy watching your competition disappearing in no later than 2,5 months.
I do believe that the main idea here was *not* to have the nuclear missles on a hair-trigger *or* to launch them within a few minutes of the beginning of a hijacking event, but rather to *notify* the party responsible, and then, if and ONLY IF absolutely NO ACTION is taken to resolve the problem after some reasonable period of time, then, and only then, it would *begin* to be a real possibility that sanctions would be applied. Believe me, none of the sponsors or proponents of this proposal wants to see the nuclear missles launched mistakenly, for example, in response to a falling meteor or a volcanic eruption somewhere. Any such premature over-reaction would quite obviously be Bad, and that passage of time usually serves to clarify intent. Regards, rfg