Hi,
It states "The syntax will make this an optional attribute". We are dealing with inconsistent records even making it mandatory in the APNIC region. How would it help? or I didn't understand properly, can anyone elaborate?
The syntax will make this an optional attribute means that you do not need it, but it will be required for the abuse-c You have a personal obejct which you use for tech-c and admin-c. Today you add an optional abuse-mailbox attribute to your object and it will show up twice while querying. In future it would be like this. If you want to use the same personal object for the abuse-c, the abuse-mailbox attribute will be optional for the personal object, but you would need it to link it with an abuse-c. So, yes it is optional for the object itself, but if you want to use the object for abuse-c you have to have it. Thanks, Tobias -- abusix
Regards,
Aftab A. Siddiqui
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Emilio Madaio <emadaio@ripe.net <mailto:emadaio@ripe.net>> wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
A new RIPE Policy Proposal has been made and is now available for discussion.
You can find the full proposal at:
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2011-06
We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to <anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net <mailto:anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net>> before 21 December 2011.
Regards
Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC