On 09/08/16, 7:06 PM, "anti-abuse-wg on behalf of Tore Anderson" <anti-abuse-wg-bounces@ripe.net on behalf of tore@fud.no> wrote:
write a policy proposal to that effect
If there were, say, the equivalent of the registration abuse policies wg at ICANN, and if the people attending RIPE aawg meetings and providing consensus were actually the abuse management teams at various ISPs, such a policy proposal might even be productive. Previous policy proposals that actually propose anything remotely useful have failed to meet consensus, or even a bare minimum of informed discussion that has any bearing on abuse management, from this wg. For example - https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/wg/services/minutes/ripe-59 “You have to get to the box and that could be a botnet”. Ha. Ha. H. Recovering resources assigned to non-existing entities http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-59/presentations/rasmussen-recovering... Uwe Manuel Rasmussen, Microsoft --srs