Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda@icann.org> writes:
However, I would suggest that if you want a data maintenance process to apply to the abuse-c object, then you should describe it. As you seem to want the RIPE NCC to remove the registration of address space if abuse-c's are not maintained appropriately, the standards required should be explicit and either included in the policy text or referenced by it.
I think this is a valid argument. The proposal should contain the desired outcome as clear and explicitly as possible. And I don't think the desired outcome is to just have a role or person object referenced as the abuse contact, but to actually have abuse contacts. -- Kostas Zorbadelos twitter:@kzorbadelos http://gr.linkedin.com/in/kzorba ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- () www.asciiribbon.org - against HTML e-mail & proprietary attachments /\