On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 02:29:48PM +0000, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:06:50AM +0100, Marco Schmidt wrote:
A new RIPE Policy proposal, "Include Legacy Internet Resource Holders in the Abuse-c Policy", is now available for discussion.
The goal of this proposal is to extend RIPE Document ripe-563, "Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE Database", to Legacy Internet Resource Holders.
There goes my new year's resolution to not bother with RIPE policy this year.
Why in all hells is this proposal in AAWG? This belongs in ncc-services or db-wg! (to be fair, Marco promulgated its existence on the relevant lists but why is everyone subjected to the ordeal of being subscribed to this list?)
It was agreed with the Chairs that it should be posted where the original abuse-c proposal was discussed.
As for the proposal, I can't see how the NCC could enforce the correctness of this for all legacy resource holders, so it doesn't serve the intended purpose.
It was briefly discussed with the NCC and there are some sort of solutions for that. Besides, it was done in the past. Some "lazy" LIRs did not updated the organisation objects on time and NCC have had to resolve this inconvenience. Piotr -- gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski@polsl.pl